Mont. Code Ann. § 82-4-432

(2007)

Application for permit -- contents -- issuance -- amendment

(1) An application for a permit must be made using forms furnished by the department and must contain the following:

(a) the name of the applicant and, if other than the owner of the land, the name and address of the owner;

(b) the type of operation to be conducted;

(c) the estimated volume of overburden and materials to be removed;

(d) the location of the proposed opencut operation by legal description and county;

(e) the date when the opencut operation is proposed to commence; and

(f) a statement that the applicant has the legal right to mine the designated materials in the lands described.

(2) The application must be accompanied by:

(a) a bond or security meeting the requirements as set out in this part;

(b) a statement from the local governing body having jurisdiction over the area to be mined certifying that the proposed sand and gravel opencut operation complies with applicable local zoning regulations adopted under Title 76, chapter 2;

(c) a plan of operation that meets the requirements of 82-4-434; and

(d) written documentation that the landowner has been consulted about the proposed plan of operation.

(3) If, prior to applying for a permit, a person notifies the department of the intention to submit an application and requests that the department examine the area to be mined, the department shall examine the area and make recommendations to the person regarding the proposed opencut operation. The person may request a meeting with the department. The department shall hold a meeting if requested.

(4) (a) Except as provided in 75-1-208(4)(b), upon receipt of an application containing all items listed in subsections (1) and (2), the department shall, within 30 days, review the application, inspect the proposed site, and notify the person whether or not the department believes that the application is acceptable. An application is acceptable if it complies with all requirements of subsections (1) and (2). If the department determines that the application is not acceptable, the department shall include in the notification a detailed identification of all deficiencies.

(b) Within 30 days of receipt of the applicant's responses to the identified deficiencies, the department shall notify the applicant if the application is acceptable or not. If the application is unacceptable, the notice must include a detailed explanation of the remaining deficiencies.

(c) The department may for sufficient cause extend either or both of the 30-day review periods for an additional 30 days if it notifies the applicant of the extension prior to the end of the respective original 30-day period. The department shall include in the notification of extension the reason for the extension.

(d) If the application is acceptable, the department shall issue a permit to the operator that entitles the operator to engage in the opencut operation on the land described in the application.

(5) An operator may amend a permit by submitting an amendment application to the department. Upon receipt of the amendment application, the department shall review it in accordance with the requirements and procedures in subsection (4). If the amendment application is acceptable, the department shall issue an amendment to the original permit.

Opinions construing this section

4 opinions
2024 MT 181 Aug 20, 2024 Reversed
Clearwater v. DEQ et al
Majority by Beth Baker · 5 to 0
ect is intended to be used for a construction project near Salmon Lake on Highway 83. 3 ¶4 On April 10, DEQ issued a deficiency letter to LHC pursuant to § 82-4-432(14)(c), MCA, asking LHC in part to clarify the number of occupied dwelling units within one-half mile of the permit boundary. On April 13, LHC submitted a revised permit a
2018 MT 148N Jun 12, 2018 Affirmed
Elliott and Mondul v. Powell Co. Planning Board
Majority by Beth Baker · 5 to 0
to a permit unless the application is ‘complete’ and DEQ determines that the application is ‘acceptable.’” Helena Sand & Gravel, Inc., ¶ 38 (quoting § 82-4-432(4)(b)(i), MCA). If DEQ finds any requirements lacking, such as a plan for groundwater protection, the permit will not move forward. Helena Sand & Gravel, Inc., ¶ 39. ¶10
2012 MT 272 Nov 30, 2012 Affirmed
Helena Sand v. L & C County
Majority by Beth Baker · 4 to 1 with 1 concurring
encies and then allow the applicant to correct the application until it is deemed complete.” HSG points to the language in the permitting process outlined in § 82-4-432, MCA (2011).3 That statute states, “[i]f the application is acceptable, the department shall issue a permit to the operator . . . .” Section 82-4-432(10)(c), MC
2008 MT 1 Jan 3, 2008 Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Flathead Citizens for Quality Growth; Tutvedt Family Partnership v. Flathead Co. Bd. of Adjustment
Majority by Patricia Cotter · 7 to 0
plication for an open cut mine permit to contain a statement from the Board certifying that the proposed operation complies with applicable zoning regulations. § 82-4-432(2)(c), MCA. However, the Board cannot issue this certification until it has approved the CUP, because only after the CUP has been approved is the operation officially cer
Official Annotations archive.org, 2007 edition
History:
En. Sec. 8, Ch. 326, L. 1973
Amd. Sec. 21, Ch. 39, L. 1977
R.C.M. 1947, 50-1508
Amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 408, L. 1991
Amd. Sec. 411, Ch. 418, L. 1995
Amd. Sec. 15, Ch. 507, L. 1999 (HB 183 - Dale, Rick (R) HD 39)
Amd. Sec. 13, Ch. 299, L. 2001 (SB 377 - Grimes, Duane (R) SD 20)
Amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 325, L. 2001 (SB 375 - Grimes, Duane (R) SD 20)
Amd. Sec. 11, Ch. 385, L. 2007 (HB 583 - Jopek, Mike (D) HD 4)