Mont. Code Ann. § 82-4-432

(1997)

Application for contract -- contents -- issuance -- amendment

(1) Applications for a contract must be made upon a form furnished by the department. The form must contain the following:

(a) the name of the operator and, if other than the owner of the land, the name and address of the owner;

(b) the type of operation to be conducted;

(c) the volume of earth to be removed, as accurately as the volume may then be estimated, and the volume which has been previously removed, if any;

(d) the location of the operation by legal subdivision, section, township and range, and county;

(e) the date when the operation was or will be commenced; and

(f) a statement that the applicant has the right and power by legal estate owned to mine by opencut mining the lands so described.

(2) The application must be accompanied by:

(a) a bond or security meeting the requirements as set out in this part;

(b) a fee of $50;

(c) a statement from the local governing body having jurisdiction over the area to be mined certifying that a proposed sand and gravel opencut mine and its operating and reclamation plans comply with applicable local zoning regulations adopted under Title 76, chapter 2; and

(d) the operator's plan of operation and the method and manner of reclamation that will be used or followed.

(3) If, prior to applying for a contract, the operator notifies the department of the intention to submit a plan and requests the department to examine the area to be mined, the department shall cause the area to be examined and make recommendations to the operator regarding reclamation.

(4) Upon receipt of the application, bond or security, and fee due from the operator and upon agreement to the terms of the contract by the parties, the department may issue a contract to the applicant which entitles the applicant to continue in or engage in opencut mining on the land therein described.

(5) An operator desiring to have a contract amended to cover additional contiguous or nearby land may file an amended application with the department. Upon receipt of the amended application and such additional bond as may be required and upon agreement to the terms of the amendment by the parties, the department may issue an amendment to the original contract covering the additional land described in the amended application without the payment of any additional fee.

(6) An operator may withdraw any land covered by contract, except affected land, by notifying the department thereof, in which case the penalty of the bond or security filed by the operator pursuant to the provisions of this part shall be reduced proportionately.

Opinions construing this section

4 opinions
2024 MT 181 Aug 20, 2024 Reversed
Clearwater v. DEQ et al
Majority by Beth Baker · 5 to 0
ect is intended to be used for a construction project near Salmon Lake on Highway 83. 3 ¶4 On April 10, DEQ issued a deficiency letter to LHC pursuant to § 82-4-432(14)(c), MCA, asking LHC in part to clarify the number of occupied dwelling units within one-half mile of the permit boundary. On April 13, LHC submitted a revised permit a
2018 MT 148N Jun 12, 2018 Affirmed
Elliott and Mondul v. Powell Co. Planning Board
Majority by Beth Baker · 5 to 0
to a permit unless the application is ‘complete’ and DEQ determines that the application is ‘acceptable.’” Helena Sand & Gravel, Inc., ¶ 38 (quoting § 82-4-432(4)(b)(i), MCA). If DEQ finds any requirements lacking, such as a plan for groundwater protection, the permit will not move forward. Helena Sand & Gravel, Inc., ¶ 39. ¶10
2012 MT 272 Nov 30, 2012 Affirmed
Helena Sand v. L & C County
Majority by Beth Baker · 4 to 1 with 1 concurring
encies and then allow the applicant to correct the application until it is deemed complete.” HSG points to the language in the permitting process outlined in § 82-4-432, MCA (2011).3 That statute states, “[i]f the application is acceptable, the department shall issue a permit to the operator . . . .” Section 82-4-432(10)(c), MC
2008 MT 1 Jan 3, 2008 Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Flathead Citizens for Quality Growth; Tutvedt Family Partnership v. Flathead Co. Bd. of Adjustment
Majority by Patricia Cotter · 7 to 0
plication for an open cut mine permit to contain a statement from the Board certifying that the proposed operation complies with applicable zoning regulations. § 82-4-432(2)(c), MCA. However, the Board cannot issue this certification until it has approved the CUP, because only after the CUP has been approved is the operation officially cer
Official Annotations archive.org, 1997 edition
History:
En. Sec. 8, Ch. 326, L. 1973
Amd. Sec. 21, Ch. 39, L. 1977
R.C.M. 1947, 50-1508
Amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 408, L. 1991
Amd. Sec. 411, Ch. 418, L. 1995