Edition 2005 Other editions
Current Version 2025 2023 2021 2019 2015 2013 2011 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1978 Scanned 1979 Scanned 1981 Scanned 1983 Scanned 1985 Scanned 1986 Scanned 1987 Scanned 1989 Scanned
1995 forward is searchable text. Earlier volumes are page scans.
173 46-18-201 77 46-18-202 154 46-18-203 10 46-18-204 4 46-18-205 3 46-18-206 1 46-18-211 46-18-212 1 46-18-213 3 46-18-219 1 46-18-220 21 46-18-221 32 46-18-222 5 46-18-223 46-18-224 16 46-18-225 33 46-18-231 42 46-18-232 1 46-18-233 5 46-18-234 2 46-18-235 24 46-18-236 3 46-18-237 51 46-18-241 30 46-18-242 59 46-18-243 27 46-18-244 2 46-18-245 21 46-18-246 5 46-18-247 1 46-18-248 8 46-18-249 2 46-18-250 3 46-18-251 7 46-18-255 1 46-18-256 46-18-261

Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-246

(2005)

Waiver or modification of payment

An offender may at any time petition the sentencing court to adjust or otherwise waive payment of any part of any ordered restitution. The court shall schedule a hearing and give a victim to whom restitution was ordered notice of the hearing date, place, and time and inform the victim that the victim will have an opportunity to be heard. If the court finds that the circumstances upon which it based the imposition of restitution, amount of the victim's pecuniary loss, or method or time of payment no longer exist or that it otherwise would be unjust to require payment as imposed, the court may adjust or waive unpaid restitution or modify the time or method of making restitution. The court may extend the restitution schedule.

Opinions construing this section

21 opinions
2026 MT 180N Aug 4, 2026 Affirmed
State v. Richards
Majority by Beth Baker · 4 to 1
hould have granted him relief from payment of restitution based on the condition “that it otherwise would be unjust to require payment as imposed . . . .” Section 46-18-246, MCA; State v. Lodahl, 2021 MT 156, ¶ 25, 404 Mont. 362, 491 P.3d 661 (citation omitted). Though we have held that the defendant is not required to formally petiti
2026 MT 172N Jul 28, 2026 Affirmed
State v. J. Rodriguez
Majority by Laurie McKinnon · 5 to 0
to pay. The District Court refused to entertain revisiting the 14-year-old restitution order and reasoned that Rodriquez’s proper avenue for relief was under § 46-18-246, MCA (2009), which provides that a court may modify restitution “at any time” under certain circumstances.2 The District Court further reasoned that given that
2025 MT 218 Sep 30, 2025 Reversed
State v. Powell
Majority by Katherine M Bidegaray · 4 to 1 with 1 concurring
n, amount of the victim’s pecuniary loss, or method or time of payment no longer exist or that it otherwise would be unjust to require payment as imposed.” Section 46-18-246, MCA. After hearing and upon such findings, “the court may adjust or waive unpaid restitution or the amount to be paid,” “extend the restitution schedule,”
2024 MT 250 Oct 29, 2024 Affirmed
State v. J. Bertsch
Majority by Beth Baker · 5 to 0
ility to maintain employment. He contends the District Court therefore erred when it imposed a restitution amount that he will be unable to pay. He argues that § 46-18-246, MCA, allows the court to adjust or waive restitution if it would be unjust to require payment and, under § 46-18-101(2)(h), MCA, and our holding in Lodahl, the Di
2024 MT 220N Sep 24, 2024 Affirmed
State v. S. Blank
Majority by Laurie McKinnon · 5 to 0
14. As Blank notes, she is free to petition the sentencing court at any time to “adjust or otherwise waive payment of any part of any ordered restitution.” Section 46-18-246, MCA. We disagree, however, that the evidence presented at the hearing could be automatically construed as such a petition and therefore preserved for appeal. Nor a
Official Annotations archive.org, 2005 edition
History:
En. Sec. 6, Ch. 426, L. 1983
Amd. Sec. 18, Ch. 125, L. 1995
Amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 181, L. 1997