Edition 2005 Other editions
Current Version 2025 2023 2021 2019 2015 2013 2011 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1978 Scanned 1979 Scanned 1981 Scanned 1983 Scanned 1985 Scanned 1986 Scanned 1987 Scanned 1989 Scanned
1995 forward is searchable text. Earlier volumes are page scans.
173 46-18-201 77 46-18-202 154 46-18-203 10 46-18-204 4 46-18-205 3 46-18-206 1 46-18-211 46-18-212 1 46-18-213 3 46-18-219 1 46-18-220 21 46-18-221 32 46-18-222 5 46-18-223 46-18-224 16 46-18-225 33 46-18-231 42 46-18-232 1 46-18-233 5 46-18-234 2 46-18-235 24 46-18-236 3 46-18-237 51 46-18-241 30 46-18-242 59 46-18-243 27 46-18-244 2 46-18-245 21 46-18-246 5 46-18-247 1 46-18-248 8 46-18-249 2 46-18-250 3 46-18-251 7 46-18-255 1 46-18-256 46-18-261

Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-231

(2005)

Fines in felony and misdemeanor cases

(1) (a) Except as provided in subsection (1)(b), whenever, upon a verdict of guilty or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, an offender has been found guilty of an offense for which a felony penalty of imprisonment could be imposed, the sentencing judge may, in lieu of or in addition to a sentence of imprisonment, impose a fine only in accordance with subsection (3).

(b) For those crimes for which penalties are provided in the following sections, a fine may be imposed in accordance with subsection (3) in addition to a sentence of imprisonment:

(i) 45-5-103(4), mitigated deliberate homicide;

(ii) 45-5-202, aggravated assault;

(iii) 45-5-213, assault with a weapon;

(iv) 45-5-302(2), kidnapping;

(v) 45-5-303(2), aggravated kidnapping;

(vi) 45-5-401(2), robbery;

(vii) 45-5-502(3), sexual assault when the victim is less than 16 years old and the offender is 3 or more years older than the victim or the offender inflicts bodily injury in the course of committing the sexual assault;

(viii) 45-5-503(2) and (3), sexual intercourse without consent;

(ix) 45-9-101(2), (3), and (5)(d), criminal possession with intent to distribute a narcotic drug, criminal possession with intent to distribute a dangerous drug included in Schedule I or Schedule II, or other criminal possession with intent to distribute a dangerous drug;

(x) 45-9-102(4), criminal possession of an opiate;

(xi) 45-9-103(2), criminal possession of an opiate with an intent to distribute; and

(xii) 45-9-109, criminal possession with intent to distribute dangerous drugs on or near school property.

(2) Whenever, upon a verdict of guilty or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, an offender has been found guilty of an offense for which a misdemeanor penalty of a fine could be imposed, the sentencing judge may impose a fine only in accordance with subsection (3).

(3) The sentencing judge may not sentence an offender to pay a fine unless the offender is or will be able to pay the fine. In determining the amount and method of payment, the sentencing judge shall take into account the nature of the crime committed, the financial resources of the offender, and the nature of the burden that payment of the fine will impose.

(4) Any fine levied under this section in a felony case shall be in an amount fixed by the sentencing judge not to exceed $50,000.

Opinions construing this section

33 opinions
2026 MT 181N Aug 4, 2026 Reversed
State v. D. Barker
Majority by Beth Baker · 4 to 0 with 3 concurring
?the nature of the crime committed, the financial resources of the offender, and the nature of the burden that payment of the fine and interest will impose.” Section 46-18-231(3), MCA. “Under Cole, the sentencing court must impose the mandatory fine under the appropriate sentencing statute, determine the defendant’s ability to pay the
2026 MT 181N Aug 4, 2026 Reversed
State v. D. Barker
Concurring by Ingrid Gustafson · 4 to 0 with 3 concurring
in State v. Cole, 2026 MT 52, 427 Mont. 64, 585 P.3d 955. ¶10 In Cole, under the guise of statutory harmonization, the Opinion ignored the plain language of § 46-18-231(3), MCA—“The sentencing judge may not sentence an offender to pay a fine unless the offender is or will be able to pay the fine.” Cole was wrongly analyzed and d
2026 MT 135 Jun 30, 2026 Reversed
State v. T. Hagberg
Majority by Cory J. Swanson · 4 to 3
a mandatory fine unconstitutionally removes the sentencing court’s discretion to relinquish the fine after conducting an ability to pay analysis pursuant to § 46-18-231(3), MCA). The State first responds that Hagberg erroneously conflates § 61-8-731(3), MCA (2019)—the statute at issue in Gibbons—with § 61-8-1008(1)(a)(i), MCA (2
2026 MT 79 Apr 21, 2026 Reversed
State v. C. Horn
Majority by Jim Rice · 4 to 0 with 3 concurring
61-8-731(1)(a)(iii), MCA (2019), provides that a person convicted of a fourth-offense DUI “shall be punished” by a fine in the range of $5,000 to $10,000. Section 46-18-231, MCA (2019), requires that “whenever” an offender has been found guilty of a felony, a sentencing court “shall take into account the nature of the crime commi
2026 MT 79 Apr 21, 2026 Reversed
State v. C. Horn
Concurring by Ingrid Gustafson · 4 to 0 with 3 concurring
nd concur with remanding this matter to the District Court to conduct an ability-to-pay analysis under Article II, Section 22, of the Montana Constitution and § 46-18-231(3), MCA (2019). To the extent this Court holds, or may be read to permit, that if the District Court determines Horn does not have the ability to pay the mandatory min
Official Annotations archive.org, 2005 edition
History:
En. Sec. 1, Ch. 198, L. 1981
Amd. Sec. 106, Ch. 370, L. 1987
Amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 610, L. 1987
Amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 575, L. 1989
Amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 42, L. 1991
Amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 519, L. 1991
Amd. Sec. 10, Ch. 52, L. 1999 (HB 48 - McGee, Dan (R) HD 21)
Amd. Sec. 21, Ch. 395, L. 1999 (HB 209 - Shockley, Jim (R) HD 61)
Amd. Sec. 18, Ch. 432, L. 1999 (HB 203 - Shockley, Jim (R) HD 61)