Edition 2025 Other editions
Current Version 2025 2023 2021 2019 2015 2013 2011 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1978 Scanned 1979 Scanned 1981 Scanned 1983 Scanned 1985 Scanned 1986 Scanned 1987 Scanned 1989 Scanned
1995 forward is searchable text. Earlier volumes are page scans.
31 40-4-201 131 40-4-202 42 40-4-203 30 40-4-204 17 40-4-205 40-4-206 40-4-207 46 40-4-208 40-4-209 1 40-4-210 28 40-4-211 124 40-4-212 1 40-4-213 9 40-4-214 7 40-4-215 1 40-4-216 9 40-4-217 5 40-4-218 92 40-4-219 22 40-4-220 6 40-4-221 1 40-4-225 40-4-226 9 40-4-227 23 40-4-228 5 40-4-233 12 40-4-234 40-4-235 40-4-251 4 40-4-252 12 40-4-253 8 40-4-254 1 40-4-255 40-4-256 40-4-257 40-4-258

Mont. Code Ann. § 40-4-215

Investigations and reports

(1) If a parent or a court-appointed third party requests, or if the court finds that a parenting proceeding is contested, the court may order an investigation and report concerning parenting arrangements for the child. The investigator may be the child's guardian ad litem or other professional considered appropriate by the court. The department of public health and human services may not be ordered to conduct the investigation or draft a report unless the person requesting the investigation is a recipient of cash assistance, as defined in 53-4-201, or a participant in the food stamp program, as defined in 53-2-902, and all reasonable options for payment of the investigation, if conducted by a person not employed by the department, are exhausted. The department may consult with any investigator and share information relevant to the child's best interests. The cost of the investigation and report must be paid according to the final order. The cost of the educational evaluation under subsection (2)(a) must be paid by the state as provided in 3-5-901.

(2) The court shall determine, if appropriate, the level of evaluation necessary for adequate investigation and preparation of the report, which may include one or more of the following:

(a) parenting education;

(b) mediation pursuant to 40-4-301;

(c) factfinding by the investigator; and

(d) psychological evaluation of the parties.

(3) In preparing a report concerning a child, the investigator may consult any person who has information about the child and the child's potential parenting arrangements. Upon order of the court, the investigator may refer the child to professional personnel for diagnosis. Except as required for children 16 years of age or older, the investigator may consult with and obtain information from medical, psychiatric, or other expert persons who have served the child in the past without obtaining the consent of the persons or entities authorized by law to grant or withhold access to the records. The child's consent must be obtained if the child is 16 years of age or older unless the court finds that the child lacks mental capacity to consent. If the requirements of subsection (4) are fulfilled, the investigator's report may be received in evidence at the hearing.

(4) The investigator shall mail the investigator's report to counsel and to any party not represented by counsel at least 10 days prior to the hearing. When consistent with state and federal law, the investigator shall make available to counsel and to any party not represented by counsel the investigator's file of underlying data and reports, complete texts of diagnostic reports made to the investigator pursuant to the provisions of subsection (3), and the names and addresses of all persons whom the investigator has consulted. Any party to the proceeding may call the investigator and any person the investigator has consulted for cross-examination. A party may not waive the right of cross-examination prior to the hearing. The results of the investigation must be included in the court record and may, without objection, be sealed.

Opinions construing this section

7 opinions
2026 MT 90 Apr 28, 2026 Reversed
Marriage of Handy
Majority by Katherine M. Bidegaray · 5 to 0
s the only person qualified to advise the court or make recommendations regarding a parenting plan. Jacob says he was entitled to examine the GAL as well under § 40-4-215(4), MCA, but did not have the opportunity because the court did not hold an evidentiary hearing. Because we remand for an evidentiary hearing, we address some, but not
2024 MT 40N Feb 27, 2024 Reversed
Marriage of Berk
Majority by Beth Baker · 5 to 0
r argument for a minor change to the proposed schedule . . . , and invited the court to rule in her favor without holding a hearing.” ¶22 In relevant part, § 40-4-215(4), MCA, states, “Any party to the [parenting] proceeding may call the investigator and any person the investigator has consulted for cross-examination. A party may
2021 MT 89N Apr 13, 2021 Affirmed
Marriage of Persoma
Majority by Laurie McKinnon · 5 to 0
he District Court erred in denying her request for a parenting investigation. Mother filed her motion for a parenting investigation in June 2018 pursuant to § 40-4-215, MCA. See § 40-4-215(1), MCA (“If a parent or a court-appointed third party requests, or the court finds that a parenting proceeding is contested, the court may
2018 MT 294N Dec 4, 2018 Affirmed
Reed v. Martin
Majority by Ingrid Gustafson · 5 to 0
n determining the best interest of the child, pursuant to § 40-4-205, MCA, the court may, but is not required to, appoint a guardian ad litem, and pursuant to § 40-4-215, MCA, the court may, but is not required to, order a parenting evaluation. We have consistently held that § 40-4-205, MCA, is not a mandatory statute and that appo
2018 MT 138N Jun 5, 2018 Affirmed
Marriage of Mangold
Majority by Mike McGrath · 5 to 0
nesses. The District Court has the discretion to determine “the level of evaluation necessary for adequate investigation and preparation of the [R]eport.” Section 40-4-215(2), MCA. ¶11 The District Court did not abuse its discretion when it amended the Stipulated Final Parenting Plan and denied Father’s request for a continuance. We
Official Annotations archive.org, 2025 edition
History:
En. 48-335 by Sec. 35, Ch. 536, L. 1975
R.C.M. 1947, 48-335
Amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 277, L. 1981
Amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 624, L. 1987
Amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 434, L. 1993
Amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 561, L. 1993
Amd. Sec. 48, Ch. 18, L. 1995
Amd. Sec. 122, Ch. 546, L. 1995
Amd. Sec. 18, Ch. 343, L. 1997
Amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 486, L. 1997
Amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 465, L. 2001 (SB 77 - Hargrove, Don (R) SD 16)
Amd. Sec. 32, Ch. 585, L. 2001 (SB 176 - McNutt, Walter (R) SD 50)
Amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 88, L. 2013 (HB 330 - Fitzpatrick, Steve (R) HD 20)
Amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 41, L. 2019 (HB 79 - Welch, Tom (R) HD 72)