Mont. Code Ann. § 76-3-207

(2011)

Divisions or aggregations of land exempted from review but subject to survey requirements and zoning regulations -- exceptions -- fees for examination of division

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), unless the method of disposition is adopted for the purpose of evading this chapter, the following divisions or aggregations of land are not subdivisions under this chapter but are subject to the surveying requirements of 76-3-401 for divisions or aggregations of land other than subdivisions and are subject to applicable zoning regulations adopted under Title 76, chapter 2:

(a) divisions made outside of platted subdivisions for the purpose of relocating common boundary lines between adjoining properties;

(b) divisions made outside of platted subdivisions for the purpose of a single gift or sale in each county to each member of the landowner's immediate family;

(c) divisions made outside of platted subdivisions by gift, sale, or agreement to buy and sell in which the parties to the transaction enter a covenant running with the land and revocable only by mutual consent of the governing body and the property owner that the divided land will be used exclusively for agricultural purposes;

(d) for five or fewer lots within a platted subdivision, the relocation of common boundaries;

(e) divisions made for the purpose of relocating a common boundary line between a single lot within a platted subdivision and adjoining land outside a platted subdivision. A restriction or requirement on the original platted lot or original unplatted parcel continues to apply to those areas.

(f) aggregation of parcels or lots when a certificate of survey or subdivision plat shows that the boundaries of the original parcels have been eliminated and the boundaries of a larger aggregate parcel are established. A restriction or requirement on the original platted lot or original unplatted parcel continues to apply to those areas.

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1):

(a) within a platted subdivision filed with the county clerk and recorder, a division, redesign, or rearrangement of lots that results in an increase in the number of lots or that redesigns or rearranges six or more lots must be reviewed and approved by the governing body before an amended plat may be filed with the county clerk and recorder;

(b) a change in use of the land exempted under subsection (1)(c) for anything other than agricultural purposes subjects the division to review under parts 5 and 6 of this chapter.

(3) (a) Subject to subsection (3)(b), a division of land may not be made under this section unless the county treasurer has certified that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be divided have been paid.

(b) (i) If a division of land includes centrally assessed property and the property taxes applicable to the division of land are not specifically identified in the tax assessment, the department of revenue shall prorate the taxes applicable to the land being divided on a reasonable basis. The owner of the centrally assessed property shall ensure that the prorated real property taxes and special assessments are paid on the land being sold before the division of land is made.

(ii) The county treasurer may accept the amount of the tax prorated pursuant to this subsection (3)(b) as a partial payment of the total tax that is due.

(4) The governing body may examine a division or aggregation of land to determine whether or not the requirements of this chapter apply to the division or aggregation and may establish reasonable fees, not to exceed $200, for the examination.

Opinions construing this section

4 opinions
2026 MT 9 Jan 27, 2026 Reversed
Sapphire v. Ravalli County
Majority by James Jeremiah Shea · 5 to 0
9 MT 417, ¶ 23, 354 Mont. 1, 221 P.3d 1200 (citations omitted). The MSPA provides for certain exemptions to the subdivision review requirements. See generally § 76-3-207(1), MCA. Specific to this case, one exemption allows a landowner to divide a tract to gift or sell the newly created parcel to an immediate family member. Section 76-3
2020 MT 239 Sep 22, 2020 Affirmed
Richards v. Gernant
Majority by Mike McGrath · 5 to 0
he division of land was to relocate common boundary lines, such that proposed tracts fell within a statutory exemption to the Subdivision and Platting Act. See § 76-3-207 (1)(a), MCA. However, Gernant contends that Richards’ COS did not comply with the requirements of the Sanitation Act and that Gernant was therefore under no legal duty t
2014 MT 207 Aug 5, 2014 Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Lewis & Clark Co. v. Hampton
Majority by Beth Baker · 4 to 1
tinction without a difference—no development could occur without fulfillment of the conditions whether or not the agricultural covenant was revoked.” ¶26 Section 76-3-207(1)(c), MCA, allows revocation of an agricultural covenant only “by mutual consent of the governing body and the property owner.” In the County’s internal memorandu
2014 MT 207 Aug 5, 2014 Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Lewis & Clark Co. v. Hampton
Dissenting by Laurie McKinnon · 4 to 1
d 20 exempted under subsection (1)(c) for anything other than agricultural purposes subjects the division to review under parts 5 and 6 of this chapter.” Section 76-3-207(2)(b), MCA. This Court has not previously considered this provision, and I believe it should do so today. In order for this provision to have any effect, the agricultural
2009 MT 417 Dec 8, 2009 Affirmed
Brad and Adina Roe v. City of Missoula
Majority by Jim Rice · 5 to 0
of evading [the MSPA]” a division of land for the “relocation of common boundaries and the aggregation of lots” is not subject to review under the MSPA. Section 76-3-207(1), MCA. ¶24 The Legislature delegated authority for review of subdivisions by requiring that “the governing body of every county, city, and town shall adopt and
Official Annotations archive.org, 2011 edition
History:
En. Sec. 4, Ch. 500, L. 1973
Amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 334, L. 1974
Amd. Sec. 19, Ch. 213, L. 1975
Amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 552, L. 1977
R.C.M. 1947, 11-3862(6)
Amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 379, L. 1985
Amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 569, L. 1989
Amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 272, L. 1993
Amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 366, L. 1993
Amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 468, L. 1995
Amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 436, L. 2003 (HB 441 - Cyr, Larry (D) HD 37)
Amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 563, L. 2003 (HB 298 - Younkin, Cindy (R) HD 28)
Amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 252, L. 2005 (SB 350 - Cocchiarella, Vicki (D) SD 47)
Amd. Sec. 12, Ch. 446, L. 2009 (HB 486 - MacLaren, Gary (R) HD 89)