Table of Contents TITLE 72. ESTATES, TRUSTS, AND FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIPS CHAPTER 33. TRUST CODE GENERAL PROVISIONS Part 2. Creation and Validity of Trusts Resulting and Constructive Trusts

Edition 2005 Other editions

Current Version 2025 2023 2021 2019 2015 2013 2011 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1978 Scanned 1979 Scanned 1981 Scanned 1983 Scanned 1985 Scanned 1986 Scanned 1987 Scanned 1989 Scanned

1995 forward is searchable text. Earlier volumes are page scans.

2 72-33-201 — Methods of creating trust 2 72-33-202 — Intention to create trust 72-33-203 — Trust property 72-33-204 — Trust purpose 1 72-33-205 — Trust for indefinite or g... 1 72-33-206 — Designation of beneficiar... 72-33-207 — Designation of trust or t... 2 72-33-208 — Statute of frauds 72-33-209 — Consideration 72-33-210 — Exception to doctrine of... 72-33-211 — Separate writing identify... 72-33-216 — Resulting trust upon fail... 72-33-217 — Resulting trust upon full... 72-33-218 — Purchase money resulting... 8 72-33-219 — Constructive trust 72-33-220 — Resulting trusts, constru...

Mont. Code Ann. § 72-33-208

(2005)

Statute of frauds

A trust is not valid unless evidenced by one of the following methods:

(1) by a written instrument signed by the trustee, or by the trustee's agent if authorized in writing to do so;

(2) by a written instrument signed by the trustor, or by the trustor's agent if authorized in writing to do so; or

(3) by operation of law.

Opinions construing this section

2 opinions

2014 MT 69 Mar 12, 2014 Affirmed in part, reversed in part

New Hope v. Faith Lutheran

Majority by Jim Rice · 7 to 0

s an intention to create a trust,” § 72-33-202, MCA (2009), and was subject to the requirements of the statute of frauds if not created by operation of law, § 72-33-208, MCA (2009). These same basic requirements are contained in the current Montana Uniform Trust Code. See §§ 72-38-401, -402(1)(b), -407, MCA. ¶61 The court rel

2011 MT 224 Sep 13, 2011 Affirmed in part, reversed in part

Boehm v. Cokedale

Majority by Beth Baker · 5 to 0

d the purported trust had no named beneficiary or process for naming one as required by § 72-33-206, MCA; did not satisfy the statute of frauds requirement of § 72-33-208, MCA; and was not a trust created by operation of law. Since Boehm was perpetuating the lawsuit on behalf of a non-existent trust, the District Court granted Cokeda

Official Annotations archive.org, 2005 edition

History:

EnactedEn. SectionSec. 16, ChapterCh. 685, Laws ofL. 1989

Source text on leg.mt.gov