Table of Contents TITLE 45. CRIMES CHAPTER 5. OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON Part 2. Assault and Related Offenses
Edition 2003 Other editions
Current Version 2025 2023 2021 2019 2015 2013 2011 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1978 Scanned 1979 Scanned 1981 Scanned 1983 Scanned 1985 Scanned 1986 Scanned 1987 Scanned 1989 Scanned
1995 forward is searchable text. Earlier volumes are page scans.
Prev Next
26 45-5-201 54 45-5-202 18 45-5-203 3 45-5-204 9 45-5-205 84 45-5-206 75 45-5-207 11 45-5-208 33 45-5-210 45-5-211 13 45-5-212 66 45-5-213 3 45-5-214 38 45-5-220 1 45-5-221 45-5-222 5 45-5-223 1 45-5-231 45-5-232 45-5-233 45-5-234

45-5-209

(2003)

Opinions construing this section

7 opinions
2023 MT 37N Feb 28, 2023 Affirmed in part, reversed in part
State v. S. Strike
Majority by Ingrid Gustafson · 5 to 0
part, and remand for further action consistent with this Opinion. ¶3 On June 18, 2019, the Hill County District Court issued a no contact order pursuant to § 45-5-209, MCA, naming Strike’s former partner, Danae Infante (Infante), as the protected person, and prohibiting Strike from contacting Infante or coming within 1,500 feet
2019 MT 177N Jul 30, 2019 Reversed
State v. D. Nolan
Majority by Laurie McKinnon · 5 to 0
, Linda, and Linda’s 20-year-old son Jarred lived at 225 Jackson Street in Billings. On May 4, 2015, a municipal court issued a no contact order pursuant to § 45-5-209, MCA, naming Linda as the protected person and prohibiting Nolan from contacting her or going near her residence or workplace. In May 2015, Linda and Jarred decide
2018 MT 144 Jun 12, 2018 Affirmed
State v. C. Knippel
Majority by Laurie McKinnon · 7 to 0
FMAs are high misdemeanors, as defined by §§ 3-10-303(1)(c) and 45-5-206(3)(a), MCA. VNCO is an ordinary misdemeanor, as described by §§ 3-10-303(1)(a) and 45-5-209(8)(c), MCA. Assuming the originally charged first-offense PFMA and the VNCO arose “at the same time as and out of the same transaction” for purposes of § 3-5-302(2)(
2018 MT 79N Apr 3, 2018 Affirmed
F. Torres v. State
Majority by Dirk M. Sandefur · 5 to 0
m. We affirm. ¶3 On February 17, 2015, Torres was convicted upon jury trial of the offense of Partner/Family Member Assault (PFMA), a felony in violation of § 45-5-209, MCA. Torres and the State subsequently entered into a written post-trial agreement pursuant to § 46-12-211(1)(b), MCA, designating Torres a persistent felony offe
2018 MT 55 Mar 20, 2018 Affirmed in part, reversed in part
State v. T. Ritesman
Majority by Beth Baker · 5 to 0
and causing her reasonable apprehension of serious bodily injury or death. It also charged Ritesman with misdemeanor violation of a no3 contact order under § 45-5-209, MCA. The State alleged that Ritesman contacted Windmueller in violation of an Order of Release and Order Setting Omnibus Hearing that the Missoula Municipal Cour
Official Annotations archive.org, 2003 edition
Source text on leg.mt.gov