Mont. Code Ann. § 76-3-625

(2007)

Violations -- actions against governing body

(1) A person who has filed with the governing body an application for a subdivision under this chapter may bring an action in district court to sue the governing body to recover actual damages caused by a final action, decision, or order of the governing body or a regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter that is arbitrary or capricious.

(2) A party identified in subsection (3) who is aggrieved by a decision of the governing body to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application and preliminary plat for a proposed subdivision or a final subdivision plat may, within 30 days after the decision, appeal to the district court in the county in which the property involved is located. The petition must specify the grounds upon which the appeal is made.

(3) The following parties may appeal under the provisions of subsection (2):

(a) the subdivider;

(b) a landowner with a property boundary contiguous to the proposed subdivision or a private landowner with property within the county or municipality where the subdivision is proposed if that landowner can show a likelihood of material injury to the landowner's property or its value;

(c) the county commissioners of the county where the subdivision is proposed; and

(d) (i) a first-class municipality, as described in 7-1-4111, if a subdivision is proposed within 3 miles of its limits;

(ii) a second-class municipality, as described in 7-1-4111, if a subdivision is proposed within 2 miles of its limits; and

(iii) a third-class municipality or a town, as described in 7-1-4111, if a subdivision is proposed within 1 mile of its limits.

(4) For the purposes of this section, "aggrieved" means a person who can demonstrate a specific personal and legal interest, as distinguished from a general interest, who has been or is likely to be specially and injuriously affected by the decision.

Opinions construing this section

14 opinions
2010 MT 79 Apr 14, 2010 Affirmed
Aspen Trails v. Helena City Commissioners
Majority by Patricia Cotter · 4 to 1 with 2 concurring
rt noted that Elliot was a contiguous landowner with respect to the proposed subdivision and was permitted to appeal the decision of the Commission pursuant to § 76-3-625(3), MCA, of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act (MSPA). Additionally, the first amended complaint alleged that the proposed subdivision would add significantly to
2009 MT 453 Dec 31, 2009 Affirmed
Richards v. County of Missoula
Majority by Brian Morris · 4 to 2
007, in which he alleged that the Board had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying his application. Richards requested damages against the County under § 76-3-625, MCA, and claimed damages against FWP under the Private Property Assessment Act, § 2-10-101, MCA, et seq. ¶11 The County provided Richards with the entire public
2009 MT 182 May 22, 2009 Reversed
Citizens v. Sanders Co. Commissioners
Majority by Jim Rice · 5 to 0
TANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Abraham v. Nelson, 2002 MT 94, ¶ 9, 309 Mont. 366, 46 P.3d 628. ¶8 Section 76-3-625(2), MCA, authorizes an appeal of a governing body’s decision to “approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application and preliminary plat for a proposed subdiv
2008 MT 214 Jun 17, 2008 Reversed
Mills v. Alta Vista
Majority by W. William Leaphart · 5 to 0
acres while leaving a remainder smaller than 160 acres? ¶11 As a threshold matter, we must address Alta Vista’s argument that Mills’ claim is barred by § 76-3-625(2), MCA. Section 76-3-625(2), MCA, allows aggrieved parties thirty days to appeal the governing body’s decision approving or denying a subdivision plat. Alta Vista d
2007 MT 118 May 22, 2007 Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Fielder v. Sanders County Bocc
Majority by Brian Morris · 5 to 0
aint had not been timely filed. The Commissioners issued written findings for the conditional preliminary plat approval for Waterfront West on March 30, 2004. Section 76-3-625(2), MCA, provides that an aggrieved party may appeal to the district court within 30 days a decision of the governing body to approve conditionally a preliminary plat
Official Annotations archive.org, 2007 edition
History:
En. Sec. 10, Ch. 468, L. 1995
Amd. Sec. 14, Ch. 298, L. 2005 (SB 116 - Laible, Rick (R) SD 44)